Do you feel tired running all the time into the same type of comments from the same type of people about the same topics? Well, me too…: BOTTOMS. PART II.

 You are still a good guy. (That is, until someone realizes that you would be the one who endangers integrity of their friends and are a true danger to their… back door. Ehm.)

No one wants to end up being gay in the bottom position.

Everyone is so scared of being the submissive bottom one. Parents, you as individual, your friends being scared that you might infect them with your gayness (counts for both groups I guess) …

(…Oh my, only now as I write this article, I realize how similar is this to the situation of women. And then they have the audacity to wonder, why female understand and can be better friends with gays than men. I guess, we are speaking about the same group of people who deem women as dogs who belong to the kitchen and to take care of “their children”, “their house”, should cook, should take care of the laundry, should clean, should take care of the house and of the

children – of course only if the man is at work, they can take care of that part of life, because the time when he is at home is dedicated to him and him alone (admire me!) again – and should be always available to men and should represent them in society on events… yeah, this wonderful comfortable life, but only for men.)

It is conveniently forgotten at those moments when we praise our dear beloved male child and support them in becoming this egoistic narcissistic strong macho that should rule the world no matter if we are speaking sports or if we are speaking home, that complementary suits the world not winning of one or the other part.´

Shall I call this part Bottom and Top?

 

I know I kind of didn't ask you, but by now we agreed on the importance of having tops in societies and having bottoms in societies, A.K.A. having males and females there.

… EXCUSE ME, I just now realized I repeated nonsense that are being constantly produced by science and constantly being refuted by  the same science, even though I swore to myself I'm not going to implement this into my stories and it is partially why I decided to write articles - as well just to try to avoid it when my mind is too preoccupied by how things are theoretically instead of what I feel is right and wrong. So, I shall just scratch everything previously told.

Now this is what I want and need to say: in a small world that is called fiction (not to be confused with the Fairy Tale called real life), we need complimentary. We need contrast, and we need complimentary.

 The contrast in storytelling is being secured by creating a character. Because one character can combine several aspects of life of typology of personalities, but he cannot combine both of them in himself or hers (that is if he does not have a split personality or some other mental problem, and again let's not confuse this one with agility of intelligent people who can combine it according to what is most beneficial for them, situation, and things like these). When you do a characteristic of one character, that is a description, it's not an action. It's not a storytelling. It's basically not enough thing, only a layer that is lying atop of the story and just shows readers and writers what directions this character should take.

storytelling. And storytelling does not live through descriptions, but through actions. …at least these days. So, we need basically some other character, who is going to be the complete opposite to the first character. You need to secure their interactions through the things - a.k.a. problems - they are going to solve, or are forced to solve, but because of their different personalities for one problem, they are going to go for the solution of it through completely different actions (a.k.a. action that goes against each other, a.k.a. the direction of that action is opposite).

For the problem, we need a solution, of course. But as well consensus. To get to the solution and because of their own personal values, the characters are even willing to argue or fight.

 And in the romance genre, we suppose that at some point there is going to be an argument or agreement or something between those two characters - in our case in the genre, it's goingto be two main male leads. The problem is being solved. The characters realize they can't live without each other. And as some higher power as some testament as agreement of what the two of them feel towards each other, the big so-called resolution is going to make them in a bed.

CONTINUE READING CONTINUE PART III.